Do you know about - Advertising - high-priced data Or Vicious Manipulation?
Kaiser Health Plan! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.Is advertising the ultimate means to acquaint and help us in our everyday decision-making or is it just an excessively considerable form of mass deception used by fellowships to persuade their prospects and customers to buy products and services they do not need? Consumers in the global hamlet are exposed to increasing whole of advertisement messages and spending for advertisements is increasing accordingly.
What I said. It isn't outcome that the real about Kaiser Health Plan. You see this article for facts about a person wish to know is Kaiser Health Plan.How is Advertising - high-priced data Or Vicious Manipulation?
It will not be exaggerated if we quit that we are 'soaked in this cultural rain of marketing communications' through Tv, press, cinema, Internet, etc. (Hackley and Kitchen, 1999). But if thirty years ago the marketing communication tools were used in general as a product-centered tactical means, now the promotional mix, and in particular the advertising is focused on signs and semiotics. Some argue that the marketers' efforts at last are "turning the economy into stamp so that it means something to the consumer" (Williamson, cited in Anonymous, Marketing Communications, 2006: 569). One necessary consequence is that many of the contemporary advertisements "are selling us ourselves" (ibid.)
The abovementioned process is influenced by the commoditisation of products and blurring of consumer's own perceptions of the companies' offering. In order to differentiate and position their products and/or services today's businesses employ advertising which is sometimes thought about not only of bad taste, but also as deliberately intrusive and manipulative. The issue of bad advertising is topical to such extent that organisations like Adbusters have embraced the tactics of subvertising - revealing the real intend behind the contemporary advertising. The Adbusters magazine editor-in-chief Kalle Lason commented on the corporate image building communication activities of the big companies: "We know that oil fellowships aren't no ifs ands or buts friendly to nature, and tobacco fellowships don't no ifs ands or buts care about ethics" (Arnold, 2001). On the other hand, the "ethics and social accountability are foremost determinants of such long-term gains as survival, long-term profitability, and competitiveness of the organization" (Singhapakdi, 1999). Without communications strategy that revolves colse to ethics and social accountability the concepts of total capability and customer relationships building become elusive. However, there could be no easy clear-cut ethics method of marketing communications.
Advertising - Prescious data Or Vicious Manipulation?
In order to get insights into the consumer perception about the role of advertising we have reviewed a whole of articles and conducted four in-depth interviews. A whole of research papers reach opposed conclusions. These vary from the ones stating that "the ethicality of a firm's behavior is an foremost consideration while the purchase decision" and that consumers "will reward ethical behavior by a willingness to pay higher prices for that firm's product" (Creyer and Ross Jr., 1997) to others stressing that "although consumers may express a desire to withhold ethical companies, and punish unethical companies, their actual purchase behaviour often remains unaffected by ethical concerns" and that "price, capability and value outweigh ethical criteria in consumer purchase behaviour" (Carrigan and Attalla, 2001). Focusing on the advertising as the most foremost marketing communication tool we have constructed and conducted an interview consisting of four themes and nine questions. The conceptual frame of this paper is built on these four themes.
Theme I. The Ethics in Advertising
The first theme comprises two initial questions about the ethics in advertising in general.
I.A. How would you define the ethics in advertising?
The term ethics in company involves "morality, organisational ethics and expert deontology" (Isaac, cited in Bergadaa', 2007). Every manufactures has its own guidelines for the ethical requirements. However, the necessary four requirements for marketing communications are to be legal, decent, honest and truthful. Unfortunately, in a society where the course of action of the fellowships is thought about by profit targets the use of marketing communications messages "may constitute a form of social pollution through the potentially damaging and unintended effects it may have on consumer decision making" (Hackley and Kitchen, 1999).
One of the interviewed respondents stated that "the most thriving fellowships do no need ethics in their activities because they have built empires." another view is that "sooner or later whoever is not ethical will face the negative consequences."
I.B. What is your perception of the importance of ethics in advertising?
The second demand is about the importance of being moral when communicating with/to your target audiences and the way consumers/customers view it. In distinct research papers we have found quite opposing conclusions. Ethics of company seems to be evaluated either as very foremost in the decision making process or as not no ifs ands or buts a serious factor in this process. An example of rather ultimate stance is that "disaster awaits any brand that acts cynically" (Odell, 2007).
It may seem inevitable that the accountability should be carried by the advertiser because "his is the key accountability in keeping advertising clean and decent" (Bernstein, 1951). On the other hand the companies' actions are defined by the "the canons of social accountability and good taste" (ibid.). One of the interviewees said:
"The only responsible for giving decent advertising is the one who profits at the end. Company's profits should not be at the price of society."
Another one stated that "our culture and the level of societal awareness rule the good and bad in advertising".
The increased importance of marketing communications ethics is underscored by the need of applying more dialogical, two-way communications approaches. The "demassification technologies have the inherent to facilitate dialogue", but the "monologic" attitude is still the illustrious one (Botan, 1997). Arnold (2001) points out the cases of Monsanto and Esso which had to pay "a price for its [theirs] one-way communications strategy". In this train of idea we may communicate ethics in advertisements from two distinct perspectives as recommend by our respondents and distinct points of view in the reviewed papers. The first one is that it is imperative to have one tasteless code of ethics imposed by the law. The other affirms the independence and accountability of every manufactures for setting its own standards.
Theme Ii. Which type of regulation should be the foremost one in the field of advertising?
The next theme directs the concentration towards the regulation principles which should be the original one. Widely approved idea is that both self regulation and legal controls should work in synergy. In other words the codes of practice are meant to complement the laws. However, in inevitable countries there are stronger legal controls over the advertising, e.g. In Scandinavia. On the other hand the industry's self regulation is favorite in the Anglo-Saxon world. Still, not everybody agrees with the laissez-faire concept.
One of our respondents said:
"I believe governments should enforce stricter legal frame and harsher punishment for fellowships which do not comply with the law."
Needless to say, the social acceptability varies from one culture/country to another. At the end of the day "good taste or bad is largely a matter of the time, the place, and the individual" (Bernstein, 1951). It would be also probably impossible to set clear-cut detailed rules in the era of Internet and interactive Tv. Therefore, both types of regulation should be applied with the ultimate aim of reaching equilibrium in the middle of the sacred right of relaxation of option and data and minimizing inherent total offence. Put differently, the goal is synchronising the "different ethical frameworks" of marketers and "others in society" in order to fill the "ethics gap" (Hunt and Vitell, 2006).
Theme Iii. Article of Advertisements.
Probably the most controversial issue in the field of marketing communications is the Article of advertisements. Nwachukwu et al. (1997) distinguish three areas of interest in terms of ethical judgment of ads: "individual autonomy, consumer sovereignty, and the nature of the product". The individual autonomy is involved with advertising to children. consumer sovereignty deals with the level of knowledge and sophistication of the target audience whereas the ads for harmful products are in the centre of social idea for a long time. We have added two more perspectives to arrive at five questions in the conducted interviews. The first one concerns the advertisement that imply sense of guilt and praise affluence that in the most cases cannot be achieved and the second one is about advertisements stimulating desire and satisfaction through acquisition of material goods.
Iii.A. What is your attitude towards the advertisement of harmful products?
A typical example is the advertisement of cigarettes. Nowadays we cannot see slogans like "Camel Agrees with Your Throat" (Chickenhead, accessed 25th September 2007) or "Chesterfield - Packs More satisfaction - Because It's More Perfectly Packed!" (Chickenhead, accessed 25th September 2007). The general advertisement, sponsorship and other marketing communications means are already prohibited to be used by cigarette producers. Surprisingly, most of the answers of the respondents were not against the cigarettes advertisement. One of the respondents said:
"People are well informed about the consequences of smoking so it is a matter of personal choice."
As with many other contemporary products the shift in communications messages for cigarettes is oriented towards stamp and image building. The same can be said for the alcohol ads. A well-known example of emotional advertising is the Absolut Vodka campaign. From Absolut Nectar, through Absolut Fantasy to Absolut World the Swedish drink no ifs ands or buts aims to be Absolut... Everything.
Advertising of hazardous products is even more harshly criticised when it is aimed at audiences with low individual autonomy, i.e. Children. Two main issues in this respect are the manipulation of cigarettes and alcohol as "the rite of passage into adulthood" and the fact that "sales of health-hazardous products (alcohol, cigarettes) create freely without much disapproval" (Bergadaa, 2007).
Iii.B. What is your attitude towards the advertisement to children?
Children are not only customers, but also consumers, influencers and users in the family Decision-Making Unit (Dmu). Additional strangeness is that they are too impressionable to be deciders in the Dmu. At the same time it is not a private that marketers apply "the same basic strategy of trying to sell the parent through the child's insistence on the purchase" (Bernstein, 1951). It is not a surprise then that "spending on advertising for children has increased five-fold in the last ten years and two thirds of commercials while child television programs are for food products" (Bergadaa 2007). In the Us alone children describe a direct purchases market of billion worth (McNeal cited in Bergadaa, 2007) which no ifs ands or buts is on the top of the agendas of many companies. While exploiting children's decision-making immaturity advertisers often go too far in dematerialising their products and "teleporting children out of the tangible and into the virtual world of brand names" (Bergadaa 2007). Immature virtual worlds like Habbo where snack food brands run advertising campaigns are already a fact of life (Goldie, 2007). The imaginative worlds are beloved not only online. Hugely thriving for creating a fantasy world is Mc Donald's. The company tops the European list of kids' advertisers while more than half of the children's adverts are for junk food.
In some countries there are harsher restrictions to the children advertising.
• "Sweden and Norway do not permit any television advertising to be directed towards children under 12 and no adverts at all are allowed while children's programmes.
• Australia does not allow advertisements while programmes for pre-school children.
• Austria does not permit advertising while children's programmes, and in the Flemish region of Belgium no advertising is permitted 5 minutes before or after programmes for children.
• Sponsorship of children's programmes is not permitted in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden while in Germany and the Netherlands, although it is allowed, it is not used in practice." (McSpotlight, accessed 20th September 2007).
According to a research by Roberts and Pettigrew (2007) the most frequent themes in children advertising are "grazing, the denigration of core foods, exaggerated health claims, and the implied capability of inevitable foods to heighten popularity, doing and mood." But the junk food is not the only surmise for parents' preoccupation. Agreeing to a study of Kaiser family Foundation (Dolliver, 2007) parents are involved about the whole of advertising of the following products (in order of importance): toys, video games, clothing, alcohol/beer, movies, etc.
The interviewed respondents were unanimous: "The advertising to children should be strictly monitored." Similar results were obtained in surveys by Rasmussen Reports and Kaiser family Foundation. Nevertheless, the legal means are just one part of the children's protection. The other part involves "the decision-making accountability of parents and teachers" which is "to support their children in developing a skeptical attitude to the data in advertising" (Bergadaa 2007). The marketers themselves should also be complex in shaping the moral principles of our hereafter and "each brand should have its own deontology - a code of practice concerning children - rather than rely on manufactures codes" (Horgan, 2007).
Iii.C. Do you think there are many misleading, exaggerating and confusing advertisements. Are many ads promising things that are not inherent to achieve?
It will not be exaggerated to state that advertising is in a sense "salesmanship addressed to masses of inherent buyers rather than to one buyer at a time" (Bernstein, 1951). Since "salesmanship itself is persuasion" (ibid.) we cannot merely blame advertisers for pursuing their sales goals. However, in the last twenty years or so advertisers have increasingly applied semiotics in their messages and as a consequence ads have begun to function more and more as symbols. One ultimate case in this stream of advertising is the creation of idealised image of a person who uses the advertised product. Bishop (2000) draws our concentration to two "typical representatives of self-identity image ads" which entice consumers to scheme the respective images to themselves through use of the products:
- "The gorgeous Woman";
- "The Sexy Teenagers.
Through setting of such stereotypes advertisers not only mislead the social and exaggerate the effects of products but also provoke low self-esteem in consumers. At the same time they promise results that in most cases are naturally impossible to achieve. Instead of promoting "'glamorous' anorexic body images" communication messages should use "varied body types" and should drop the idea of the "impossible physical body images" (Bishop, 2000).
To demand Iii.C one of the respondents commented:
"The customers of these products [the ones advertised through thin models] are mostly population who do not have the same physical characteristic. For me, this type of advertising is deliberately aimed at population to make them feel not complete, far from attractive social outsiders."
However, another interviewed stated that: "every person has his own way of evaluating what is believable and what is misleading. Consumers are sufficient sophisticated to know what is exaggerated."
Similarly, Bishop (2000) concludes that "image ads are not false or misleading", and "whether or not they advocate false values is a matter for subjective reflection." The author argues that image ads do not interfere with our internal autonomy and if population are misled, it is because they want it. It is all about our free option of behaviour and no advertisement can modify our desires. Perhaps, the truth lies somewhere in-between the two ultimate positions.
Iii.D. What is your attitude towards advertisement that imply sense of guilt, and praise affluence that in the most cases cannot be achieved?
A more definite case of controversial advertising is the one used to "promote not so much self indulgence as self doubt"; the one that "seeks to originate needs, not to fulfill them: to originate new anxieties instead of allaying old ones" (Hackley and Kitchen, 1999). A response of our interviewee reads:
"It is not only a matter of advertising. It has to do with the social inequality and the desire to possess what you can not."
Hackley and Kitchen (1999) refer to this contrast as to "when reality does not match the image of affluence and the follow is a subjective feeling of dissonance". The issue could be elaborated Additional through the next question.
Iii.E. Are advertisements stimulating desire and satisfaction through acquisition of material goods moral?
We live in a society which is more or less marked by materialism. Advertisements are often blamed to fuel consumption which is allegedly foremost to happiness. The role of promoting satisfaction through acquisition of material goods has become so foremost that currently the "media products are characterised by relativism, irony, self referentiality and hedonism" (Hackley and Kitchen, 1999). Is the beloved saying "those who die with most toys win" no ifs ands or buts a motivator in consumers' behavior and could consumption be the cure of emotional dissonance? This seems to be the case provided a brand succeeds to enter in the evoked set of consumer choices. This new "kind of materialism" goes hand in hand with "the emergence of individualism via sheer hedonism along with narcissism and selfishness" (Bergadaa 2007).
Theme Iv. Is the quantity of advertisements justified?
Iv.A. Do you think there is too much advertising?
An audit of food advertising aimed at children in Australia by Roberts and Pettigrew (2007) revealed that "28.5 hours of children's television programming sampled contained 950 advertisements." Actually, we all are being bombarded by ads on Tv, Internet, print media, etc. The whole and Article of marketing communications messages puts the consumer's data processing capacity to a test. The exposure to marketing data overload often leads to diluted consumer's selective perception. either our responses are circumscribed by "confusion, existential despair, and loss of moral identity" or we "adapt constructively to the [communications] Leviathan and become intelligent, cynical, streetwise" (Hackley and Kitchen, 1999) is a demand open to debate.
Two opposite streams of attitudes were produced in our research. One stance is involved with the undue quantity of advertisement. The other stream proclaims that "If there is an advertisement, so it is justified by a need." We agree that the communications overload may no ifs ands or buts have "pervasive follow on the social ecology of the developed world" (Hackley and Kitchen, 1999). If the increasing communication pollution is not managed properly by both legal and manufactures points of view yet again the advertising will manage "to hoist its foot to its own mouth and kick out a concentrate of its own front teeth" (Bernstein, 1951).
Conclusion
In preparing of this paper we have used qualitative depth interviews in order to get insights for what actual customers opine. We have also substantiated our presentation with references to a whole of influential articles in the field of ethics in marketing communications. Generally, our respondents as well as discrete authors have taken two opposing stances. The first one affirms that ethics in marketing communications matters considerably, whereas the other one downsizes the importance of ethics, thereby stressing the role of other factors in consumer decision-making, i.e. Price, brand loyalty, convenience, etc.
Marketers should understand their "responsibility for the emerging portrait of hereafter society" (Bergadaa 2007). Not only there is a need of legal ethical frame but also expert ethical benchmarks and deontology should be in place. One of the main challenges is to avoid creating "a happy customer in the short term", because "in the long run both consumer and society may suffer as a direct follow of the marketer's actions in 'satisfying' the consumer" (Carrigan and Attalla, 2001).
The strength of the advertisement affect exerted on consumers is only one part of the equation. On the other hand we may affirm that consumers are not morally subservient and Agreeing to the data process models there is a natural cognitive defense. The communications tools "offer us a theatre of our own imagination" (Hackley and Kitchen, 1999). Consequently, we accept the reality in terms of our own experiences. In this sense marketers do not originate reality - they are naturally a mirror of the society. We may argue that unfortunately this is not always the case.
Advertising is often deservedly seen as the embodiment of consumer relaxation and choice. Notwithstanding this foremost role, when the option is "between one candy bar and another, the most recent savoury snack or sweetened breakfast cereal or fast food restaurant" (McSpotlight, accessed 20th September 2007) it represents whatever else but not an alternative and no ifs ands or buts not a salutary one.
The words of Bernstein (1951), said fifty-six years ago are still very much a demand of present interest: "It is not true that if we 'save advertising, we save all,' but it seems reasonable to assume that if we do not save advertising, we might lose all."
Anonymous (2006). Module Book 6, Marketing Communications, University of Leicester.
Arnold, M. (2001). Walking the Ethical Tightrope (Marketing Corporate social Responsibility), Marketing, 7/12/1001, p. 17.
Bergadaa M. (2007). Children and Business: Pluralistic Ethics of Marketers, society and company Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 53-73.
Bernstein, S. R. (1951). Good Taste in Advertising, Harvard company Review, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 42-50.
Bishop, J. D. (2000). Is Self-Identity Image Advertising Ethical?, company Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 371-398.
Botan, C. (1997). Ethics in Strategic communication Campaigns: The Case for a New coming to social Relations, Journal of company Communication, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 188-202.
Carrigan, M. And Attalla, A. (2001). The Myth of the Ethical consumer - Do Ethics Matter in purchase Behaviour?, Journal of consumer Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 560-577.
Chickenhead, 'Truth in advertising'. Online. Ready at: chickenhead.com/truth/chesterfield6.html (accessed 25th September 2007).
Chickenhead, 'Truth in advertising'. Online. Ready at: chickenhead.com/truth/camel1.html (accessed 25th September 2007).
Creyer, E. H. And Ross Jr. W. T. (1997). The affect of Firm Behavior on purchase Intention: Do Consumers no ifs ands or buts Care About company Ethics?, Journal of consumer Marketing, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 421-432.
Dolliver, M. (2007). A Parental Dim View of Advertising, Adweek, Vol. 48, No. 26, pp. 25.
Goldie, L. (2007). Brands Free To Use Virtual Worlds To Target Kids, New Media Age, 8/9/2007, p. 2.
Hackley, C. E. And Kitchen P. J. (1999). Ethical Perspectives on the Postmodern Communications Leviathan, Journal of company Ethics, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 15-26.
Horgan, S. (2007). Online Brands Need Their Own Ethical Guidelines, Marketing Week, Vol. 30, No. 26, p. 30.
Hunt, S. D. And Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general principles of Marketing Ethics: A improvement and Three Questions, Journal of Macromarketing; Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 143-153.
McSpotlight, 'Advertising to children, Uk the worst in Europe' Online. Ready at: mcspotlight.org/media/press/food_jan97.html, (accessed 20th September 2007).
Nwachukwu, S.L.S, Vitell, Jr. S.J., Gilbert, F.W., Barnes, James H. (1997). Ethics and social accountability in Marketing: An exam of the Ethical estimate of Advertising Strategies, Journal of company Research, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 107-118.
Odell, P. (2007). Marketing under the Influence, Promo, Vol. 20, No. 6, p. 27.
Roberts, M. And Pettigrew, S. (2007). A Thematic Article determination of Children's Food Advertising, International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 357-367.
Singhapakdi, A. (1999). Perceived importance of Ethics and Ethical Decisions in Marketing,
Journal of company Research, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 89-99.
Stanford University, 'Alcoholic Advertisements'. Online. Ready at: stanford.edu/class/linguist34/advertisements/alcohol%20ads/index.htm, (accessed 20th September 2007).
Vintage Virginia Slims, Online. Ready at: freenet-homepage.de/mshel120/vintage/vintage-vs.html, (accessed 25th September 2007).
I hope you will get new knowledge about Kaiser Health Plan. Where you can offer easy use in your daily life. And just remember, your reaction is Kaiser Health Plan.Read more.. Advertising - high-priced data Or Vicious Manipulation?. View Related articles associated with Kaiser Health Plan. I Roll below. I have counseled my friends to assist share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share Advertising - high-priced data Or Vicious Manipulation?.
No comments:
Post a Comment